Yesterday the Herald published two articles that both contained interesting observations about the way Scotland and the independence referendum are perceived in London.
Iain Mcwhirther pointed out that the Scottish press is completely ignored in London: "The reason so many BBC network news programmes seem so anglocentric is because they tend to take their editorial agenda from the press, which doesn't report Scotland in its London editions. This, rather that any anti-Scottish bias among editors of the 6pm news or Any Questions, accounts for the absence of Scottish stories."
Andrew Marr noted that there is an assumption Scotland will vote No to independence: "Whenever London Scots get together and talk about independence, there is a general assumption the people back home will never actually vote for it -- that a vote for the Scottish National Party in Holyrood is simply the latest wheeze to put pressure on London for financial favours is blandly repeated in bars and television studios. 'They willnae.' ... I have become less certain: next September, they micht."
Taken together, these two remarks make it clearer why the UK media have concluded that the referendum have already been decided (as I noted more than a year ago). If they don't access Scottish media, they will out of necessity get their information primarily from Scots living in London, and if they in turn have decided it'll be a No, that then becomes the established truth in the Westminster bubble.
It's quite interesting to contemplate why the London Scots have already decided it will be a No. It has probably something to do with the widespread assumption that talent moves to London, and that the people who didn't leave are too stupid to think for themselves.
I have a feeling the London Scots might get a big surprise in September 2014!