Scotland should have 109 MPs, not 52
The Tories and the LibDems are reducing the number of seats in the House of Commons from 646 to 600. As part of this, the four nations’ representations will be equalised to the same number of voters per seat (until now, the smaller nations have had smaller seats than England); for instance, Wales will see its number of MPs drop from 40 to 30.
Most people seem to think this is fair, and many English MPs are even calling for a further reduction in the number of Scottish MPs to cancel out the effect of Scottish devolution.
However, according to the Penrose method, also sometimes described as the square root formula, each nation should get allocated seats according the square root of the population to achieve equal voting powers for all people represented.
Here’s a table showing the figures for actual and calculated numbers of MPs:
|Country||Population||Actual 2015 seats||Square root seats|
The square root method has been suggested for allocating seats in the European Parliament (although the current method used there results in similar results).
I guess it all depends on the status of the four nations of the UK. If they’re just seen as electoral regions of a single country, the CoLD coalition’s proposal makes perfect sense (but then devolution should probably be abolished); on the other hand, if the Westminster Parliament is seen as a supranational parliament for the union of the four sovereign nations of the UK, the Penrose method should be used.
If Penrose isn’t used, I presume it means Scotland will have more influence as an independent country, so unless the No parties put Penrose on the table as an alternative, I would strongly suggest voting Yes to independence.
2 thoughts on “Scotland should have 109 MPs, not 52”
Pingback: How Thatcher destroyed the coalition of nations | Arc of Prosperity
Pingback: What devo-max really means | Scottish Independence News