Trying to understand the Tories
Westminster politics often makes me feel foreign — the fact that it doesn’t make any more sense now than it did when I arrived in Scotland 14 years ago just shows how completely divorced Scotland and England already are politically.
The Tories’ referendum on leaving the EU is a prime example. In Scotland you simply don’t encounter that deep antipathy towards the EU that clearly must be a common theme amongst natural conservatives in England, and as a result what’s happening just now simply doesn’t feel relevant to me. Unfortunately, Scotland voted No to independence, and as a result, this referendum is happening here too, and the outcome does matter to people in Scotland (not least to EU citizens like me).
I therefore have to get my head round this. The first question I’ve been asking myself is why Cameron decided to boldly split his own party like no man has split it before, and in particular, how he ended leading the Stay campaign.
Before the summer holiday, I had convinced myself that he was looking for an excuse to head the Leave campaign:
My guess is he’s already expecting his negotiations will fail (if for no other reason because he’s asking for things that any EU expert will tell him the other countries won’t give him), and he’ll then go out and say something along these lines: “I really wanted to remain in a reformed EU, but the other countries have turned their backs on us, so I will with a heavy heart have to recommend that this great nation leaves the EU.”
Why is Cameron doing this? My guess is it’s to save the Conservative party. If he came out in favour of leaving the EU already, some pro-business Tories would break out, and if he campaigned in favour of EU membership, a very large number of MPs would rebel. By pretending to negotiate in good faith, he keeps the pro-EU Tories happy, and by setting the negotiations up to fail, he ensures the Eurosceptics will eventually be happy.
I was mulling this over when my beloved wife pointed out that I might have been right but that this analysis was overtaken by events. In normal circumstances, a lot of EU countries would have been quietly relieved to see the UK leave, so they wouldn’t have been willing to agree to many of his demands (and in fact Angela Merkel gave them a rather lukewarm reception when he first aired them).
However, these are not normal circumstances. The whole world is getting rather destabilised, and the EU is facing a lot of obstacles on many fronts simultaneously. The EU leaders therefore were afraid the whole edifice would come tumbling down if they gave Cameron the cold shoulder, so they were forced to agree to his proposals without major changes. As a result, he couldn’t really claim to have been let down.
However, this leaves Cameron in a horrible position. As John Rentoul described it in The Independent:
If Cameron wins this referendum he will be hobbled by his party. Within moments of the result, the anti-EU Tory party will be looking towards the next referendum. At some point the EU treaties will have to be rewritten and it will be hard to resist demands for another referendum. Far from settling the European question, this referendum could ensure that Europe will dominate the Tory party’s choice of Cameron’s successor. […]
If Cameron loses the referendum, forget all his hints about staying on. His time would be over. His party would not countenance Brexit negotiations being handled by a leader who wanted to stay in. One way or the other, this is the end of his premiership: we just don’t know how or exactly when.
I’ve said before that Cameron seems to be a clever tactician but a lousy strategist. I guess this might be yet another example of this, because surely he’s ended up somewhere he never wanted to be.
I wouldn’t mind the Tories half as much if they were just a fringe freak show (a bit like UKIP), but living in a country where these hapless wretched people have a parliamentary majority scares me witless.
The only glimmer of hope is that perhaps this referendum will lead to Scottish independence sooner rather than later.
11 thoughts on “Trying to understand the Tories”
Alistair McGregor liked this on Facebook.
Brigitte Binger liked this on Facebook.
RT @arcofprosperity: New blog post: Trying to understand the Tories https://t.co/jofPvkns2z #StayAndThenYes
Westminster politics is all about ME ME ME. “I’m not rich enough even though my stash is way more than one needs in a lifetime.” Corruption is endemic and the name of the game in order to feed the ME.
Supress anyone who gets in the way of ME and take their wealth and spend it on ME.
Trying to understand the Tories https://t.co/XrEnIffen7
My theory is the entire Tory party is for the OUT campaign. Why? Because they can then make the City of London an even stronger financial fortitude without ANY interference from Brussels.
Cameron leads the IN camp, to show his “leadership” and “commitment” to Europe. But you can tell his heart isn’t in it, one bit.
He probably does step down as PM, but don’t think he won’t be handsomely rewarded for his role in making the UK an even stronger, anti-tax, corrupt place for the finance industry.
That’s my theory.
Bring on Indyref 2!
Interesting theory. But wouldn’t it have been easier for the Tories to campaign together for OUT in that case?
Thomas Widmann Because I think the Tories want to give the impression of being at least half way supportive of Europe. After all, they don’t want to go full UKIP, because at least 40% of their support is pro-EU.
Reminds me of the AV vote. Labour was “divided”, but you knew they weren’t serious about changing the voting system for WM elections. Because they benefit from the current system as much as the Tories.
Of course, I could be completely wrong. But watch Cameron speak in “support” of the EU. You can tell he genuinely doesn’t really care about staying IN the EU.
Trying to understand the Tories https://t.co/Y7TZNAo3oe via @ArcOfProsperity
Alister Rutherford liked this on Facebook.
“Westminster politics often makes me feel foreign”
Me too Thomas. As does the media and shows like Question Time. If it’s any help, go back 20 or 30 years and that wasn’t the case at all. Even as late as 2001 I remember looking at US politics and shows around 9/11 as being incredibly foreign and I was glad the UK wasn’t like that. What I see now in the UK is the same kind of US politics I looked aghast at then. And they still look foreign, but I’m constantly told I’m part of the UK and “British”. I don’t recognise the UK – politically and media wise – as my country at all anymore.